E-Cigarette Related Complications and Regulations at Swansea University – Addiction Example

Download free paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

"E-Cigarette Related Complications and Regulations at Swansea University" is a perfect example of a paper on addiction. The impacts of e-cigarette smoking remain inconclusive since the trend has developed recently. Although the concept of battery-powered smoking devices is ancient, it took several years before it was released. For instance, the tools were first introduced in the US market in 2007. Since the discovery of e-cigarette, they have become popular among tobacco smokers. E-cigarettes are viewed as a convenient alternative for a significant number of cigarette smokers (Kaur et al. , 2018). Furthermore, statistics show that there has been a steady increase in the use of e-cigarettes among non-smoking individuals.

The sad fact is most smokers are youths and adolescents. Therefore, the focus of this study is understanding some of the healthcare complications caused by the constant use of e-cigarettes. Questionsi. What is, are the toxicity levels of e-cigarettes? (Etter, 2015)ii. What is the tendency of e-cigarette use among non-smokers at Swansea University? iii. How often do smokers use vaporizers at Swansea University? iv. What are some of the respiratory complications developed from the constant use of e-cigarettes? v.

Are the Swansea University smoking regulations useful in reducing e-cigarette use? Objectivesi. To determine the toxicity levels of vaporizers. ii. To understand the tendency of e-cigarette use among non-smokers at Swansea University. iii. To determine the rate at which smokers use e-cigarettes at Swansea University. iv. To understand some of the respiratory complications that develop from the constant use of e-cigarettes. v. To evaluate the impact of smoking regulations at Swansea University. Significance (Gaps)The medical complications that are caused by e-cigarette use are unknown. Studies show that electronic cigarettes have fewer chemical compositions when compared to traditional tobacco.

The use of e-cigarettes is considered to be a safer option for smokers. However, some studies carried out in vitro have different results. The cytotoxic impact of e-cigarette use varies from one refill fluid to another (Hua and Talbot, 2016). Perhaps, it is because the chemical compositions used when creating the flavors are different. Hence, this study aims at identifying some of the health complications that are caused by e-cigarettes. Methods a) ParticipantsStudents from Swansea University were recruited to participate in the study. The advertisement will be carried out on the school portal and posts pinned on department notice boards.

Consequently, the interested parties are contacted via phone calls to assess whether they should be included or excluded from the study (Harrell et al. , 2019). In this case, stratifications of e-cigarette use will be based on cigarette smokers, e-cigarette vaporizer users, dual users, and nonusers. b) InterviewsThe interviews will be done online and in person. First, the online interview is useful in determining whether I should include or exclude individual participants. The method helps to narrow down the number of participants in the study.

Secondly, the one-on-one interview is useful in generating credible information for my research. Sampling The sampling method will be non-probability and purposeful sampling since my study is taking place at Swansea University. Notably, my main focus is understanding the rate of e-cigarette use, the implications, and its impact on students. Consequently, my sampling is purposeful because I have a pre-selected criterion to use when selecting my participants (Whitehead and Annells, 2007). The requirements act as a guide when selecting participants.

References

Whitehead, D., & Annells, M. (2007). Sampling data and data collection in qualitative research. Nursing and midwifery research. Methods and appraisal for evidence-based practice, 105-121.

Harrell, P. T., Brandon, T. H., England, K. J., Barnett, T. E., Brockenberry, L. O., Simmons, V. N., & Quinn, G. P. (2019). Vaping expectancies: a qualitative study among young adult nonusers, smokers, vapers, and dual users. Substance abuse: research and treatment, 13, 1178221819866210.

Kaur, G., Pinkston, R., Mclemore, B., Dorsey, W. C., & Batra, S. (2018). Immunological and toxicological risk assessment of e-cigarettes. European Respiratory Review, 27(147).

Etter, J. F. (2015). E-cigarettes: methodological and ideological issues and research priorities. BMC medicine, 13(1), 32.

Hua, M., & Talbot, P. (2016). Potential health effects of electronic cigarettes: a systematic review of case reports. Preventive medicine reports, 4, 169-178.

Download free paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us