Comparison of Inpatient and Ambulatory Care – Health System Example

Download free paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

"Comparison of Inpatient and Ambulatory Care" is a perfect example of a paper on the health system.   The scope of the level of service in inpatient care includes treatment amenities and access to specific care departments. Treatment services are medicine, surgery, psychological health, dialysis, and care for serious injuries or illnesses (Levant and DeFrances, 2012). One of the major accesses to specific care departments is the ICU (Intensive Care Unit), which contains remedial, surgical, psychological, and heart-related services. Other specific care units are Transplant Clinics, Spinal Cord Damage Divisions, Traumatic Brain Damage Divisions, and Multi-Trauma Facilities.

In contrast, ambulatory care provides a range of clinical services to grownups and children in the fields of orthopedics, neurology, and therapy. The scope of the level of service in ambulatory care includes personalized treatments, all-inclusive care, and extra services (Johnson, 2010). Personalized treatments in ambulatory care involve the allocation of a listed nurse accountable for organizing a patient’ s care all through the caregiving session. All-inclusive care entails a multifaceted team that offers care to a patient by mixing the exceptional skills of physicians, nurses, bodily and professional therapists, and nurse assistants.

Extra services for ambulatory care include Ambulette amenities, on-site orthotic amenities, translators, pre and post-organization, and any accepted health insurance plans. Second                       Venues for service delivery in inpatient care comprises mostly of wards. Wards for inpatient care are usually a combination of single rooms and halls (Levant and DeFrances, 2012). Inpatients in such settings have a right of entry to single-gendered lounges, but the wards usually have to share a number of the social places and eating rooms. Wards in inpatient care can comprise of PICUs with a maximum of five beds that offer evaluation and dynamic, rigorous, and thorough multifaceted treatment.

This sort of care usually applies to patients whose behavior calls for a significant degree of monitoring and care more than that open admittance wards for critical care offer. Venues for service delivery in ambulatory care undertake more importance because the focus on care usually shifts from inpatient settings (Ormond and Lutzky, 2011). More hospitals actually think about expanding ambulatory care by constructing big buildings and adding vans required for ambulatory care. This way, ambulatory care grids, and amenities increase.

This is a clear indication of the significance of vehicles and building facilities for moving patients to physician care within a hospital. Third             The impact on healthcare finance suggests there is a difference between inpatient and ambulatory care. In 2008, the MHPAEA act aimed at bettering access to psychological healthcare and drug abuse therapy in public hospitals. These services are part of inpatient care and required a rise in healthcare finance. An analysis of psychological healthcare, drug abuse therapy and medicinal or surgical care by the HCCI indicated that government expenditure per capita, application, costs, and outflows to patients below 65 years old did not cover employer-funded insurance (Herrera, Hargraves, and Stanton, 2013).

Since all these constitute inpatient care, clearly healthcare finance affects the amenities allocated by public hospitals to cater to them. On the other hand, the expectations and execution of substantial healthcare finance-led hospitals and other healthcare companies to reassess their approaches and rules on ambulatory care. These expectations occurred partially because of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Johnson, 2010).

References

Herrera, C., Hargraves, J., and Stanton, G. (February 2013). The Impact of the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act on Inpatient Admissions, Issue Brief #5. Washington, DC: Health Care Cost Institute.

Johnson, T. K. (2010). Ambulatory Care Stands Out Under Reform. Westchester, IL: Healthcare Financial Management.

Levant, S. and DeFrances, C. (2012). Electronic collection of inpatient and ambulatory hospital care data: national hospital care survey. Proceedings of the 13th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, Pp. 200-205

Ormond, B. A., and Lutzky, A. W. (2011). Ambulatory Care for the Urban Poor: Structure, Financing, and System Stability. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

Download free paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us