Disparities in Child vs Adult Health Care – Health System Example

Download free paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

"Disparities in Child vs Adult Health Care" is a great example of a paper on the health system. After reading this article, it is clear that the status of healthcare in children is filled with disparities As a matter of fact, the poor get no or less treatment which is detrimental to the future of healthcare. Conducive research indicates that four billion healthcare claims are submitted annually. Even though a small portion is submitted through fraud, the estimated loss in these fraudulent activities can result in up to a hefty $56.7 in losses.

This can be detrimental as Medicare will be a huge issue around 2033. Another important aspect within the realm of 120,000 eligible healthcare professionals and more than 3,300 hospitals have qualified to participate, which allows seamless access of patients to extract their information online “ outpatient lab reporting” as a menu option for hospitals and “ recording clinical notes” as a menu objective for both physicians and hospitals. Stageful 2 is a supplementary transition for organizations from stageful. The purpose is to also facilitate regulation in an organizational environment. A push towards adapting electronic paperwork for hospitals and medical institutions.

A better approach to collecting and analyzing for better business support. Another huge emphasis was on the revenue cycle that are derived via services in healthcare. First and foremost, the continuum of care was one of the most acute services that were provided. These services allow hospitals to generate revenue via primary and secondary care. Primary care has been a top source of revenue because it is the first person that interacts with the patient. Minorities have less access to health care than whites.

The level of lack of insurance for Hispanics is 34% compared with 13% among whites. However, primary care was only given to those children that can support it, which conflicts with the notion of healthcare itself. Additionally, diverse healthcare will truly support a better healthcare system as the language barrier will also be rectified. After this conducive research, it is clear that it does not meet its objective because 8.7 million children were uninsured; nearly three-quarters had family incomes low enough to qualify for Medicaid or SCHIP. Moreover, only eleven states employed a strictly Medicaid expansion approach as registration remains complicated and unstable.

As a matter of fact, two-thirds of all children losing public insurance experience a break in coverage. Hence, the SCHIP has failed to provide what it was created for. It is clear that SCHIP programs must address their administration to the underlying Medicaid entitlement that it lacks not to mention lack of flexibility. Children that are born in ineligible families have no channel to receive adequate healthcare which does not facilitate the cause.

If states have to fight with national laws to enact SCHIP, it becomes more of a hassle rather than a working force to comply with. Hence, SCHIP must address those issues to be successful.


Acevedo-Garcia, D., Osypuk, T., McArdle, N., et al. (2008, Mar./Apr.). Toward a policy-relevant analysis of geographic and racial/ethnic disparities in child health. Health Affairs, 27(2), 321-333.

Raphael, J. & Beal, A. (2010). A review of the evidence for disparities in child vs adult health care: A disparity in disparities. Journal of the National Medical Association, 102(8), 684-91. Retrieved from ProQuest

Vistnes, J., & Schone, B. (2008). Pathways to coverage: the changing roles of public and private sources. Health Affairs, 27(1), 44-56.

Download free paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us