"Healthcare Quality Assessment" is a wonderful example of a paper on the health system. There are various approaches to quality improvements in healthcare quality assessment. However, this essay compares and contrasts quality indicator and performance indicator assessment approaches. Quality indicators in healthcare assessment are primarily formulated based on scientific and evidence-based research work procedures. Through quality indicators’ clinical guidelines, it is possible to analyze the scope of health care based on the systematic care service provisions. Quality care indicators are value-free, and this ensures that this approach provides a well-inferred quality judgment about the excellence of the care provided.
This approach, according to Jacobsen (2012), is the most preferable assessment approach in primary care (Jacobsen, 2012). This is because it provides for a reliable, valid, feasible, and sensitive primary care diagnosis methodology. Additionally, this approach is a more advanced method of developing evidence-based scientific clinical changes in primary care as opposed to the performance indicators approach. Whereas quality indicators are procedural and scientific-based, performance indicators are quantity-based and depend majorly on case studies. Unlike quality indicators, performance indicators are usually used in extreme care circumstances where quality indicator methods inaccessible (Freeman, 2002).
Additionally, performance indicators approach majors in the performances and quantity of primary care activities in the scientific clinical changes (Freeman, 2002). This type of diagnostic approach measures the frequency of events hence it is more of a quantity-based mode of care indicator. The performance indicator is based on the case studies hence making this approach value-laden. Additionally, the performance indicator is a non-procedurally based proposition as it depends on the secondary data sources to extract clinical guidelines. A research work should be pure in its hypothesis in order to be testable and verifiable.
This makes performance indicators insensitive to scientific clinical changes more than quality indicators.
Freeman, Tim. (2002). Using performance indicators to improve health care quality in the public sector: a review of the literature. Health Service Management , 126-137.
Jacobsen, K. H. (2012). Introduction to health research methods: A practical guide. Jones & Bartlett Learning: Burlington, MA.