"Quality Improvement in Public Health" is a wonderful example of a paper on the health system. In many sectors, certain concepts concerning Quality Improvement (QI) have been undertaken in order to ensure that customers receive satisfactory services as well as to improve process functioning within these organizations. Recently, these conceptions of quality improvement have found applicability in public health in an attempt to assure the customers to these institutions receive quality services. QI is considered a divergent supervisory procedure, and a collection of tools as, well as, methodologies that are synchronized, to make certain that departments consistently achieve the requirements for the populace within the society.
Presentation of various concepts of QI such as CQI within the public health sector causes the emergence of various issues that offer different reactions from the public, and implications to the conveyance of services within the sector in the prospect. Article Summary The editorial concentrates on the concept of QI in public health that offers numerous confrontations in making it work within the sector. The basis for QI emanates from a sequence of case studies that have been performed through the utilization of QI projects (Randolph & Lea, 2012).
In accordance with the article, the case studies consider dissimilar concepts with respect to QI. These considerations in the undertaking QI projects and maintenance of QI endeavor through the development of the required infrastructure and culture that prop up CQI (Randolph & Lea, 2012). The case studies are meant to assess the success rate of QI and CQI. These case studies have been developed in North Carolina for efficiency considering different subjects, and aimed at the countryside, as well as, smaller agencies since, at the recent time; most information has concentrated on the metropolitan and larger agencies.
The studies have transpired through the utilization of frequently utilized QI techniques. These techniques include Lean and Model for Improvement, which offer data that can be compared with previous data thus allowing for enhancement of health within the societies around America (Randolph & Lea, 2012). The article highlights different drivers and constraints in public health in the embracing of QI. Different national organizations have offered to ensure embracing of QI concepts thus serving as drivers in community health as seen in healthcare.
In addition, accreditation has presented support to the matter thus acting as a driving force for the projects (William, John, Liza, Leslie, Ronald & Abbey, 2010). However, constraints have presented numerous challenges to the adoption of the process thus hindering progress. The article offers imperative opportunities that are hoped to elevate the embracing of QI and CQI in the sector. In accordance with the article, the triumph of health departments will be assessed based on the capacity to espouse and maintain CQI within the sector (Randolph & Lea, 2012). Reactions to the findings The findings of the article offer stakeholders in public health prior or foremost information concerning QI in order to presents a real situation for the establishment of the process within their areas.
The findings offer constraints and drivers for the involved parties to establish ways to ensure they beat the constraints and utilize the drivers for success in espousing QI. The article gives data from the uncommon situation although it seems appropriate to ensure efficiency in the implementation of the procedures. In addition, the article offers prospect chances in ensuring that public health achieves QI and CQI for excellent service conveyance within the society.
Therefore, the article can be considered to offer sizeable information concerning the adoption of QI within the sector. Implications of the findings The findings from the article imply that, in the prospect, it is anticipated that public health will embrace the changes presented by the adoption of QI and CQI concepts. Adoption of these concepts is anticipated to ensure quality conveyance of services for the customers through various improvements (William, John, Liza, Leslie, Ronald & Abbey, 2010).
The improvements include reduced variability in the services offered in public health, concentration on outcomes, and improvements in systems performances (Seid, Lotstein, Valerie, Nelson & Lurie, 2006).
Randolph G. D. & Lea, C. S. (2012). Quality Improvement in Public Health: Moving
From Knowing the Path to Walking the Path.
Retrieved from < http://www.academia-research.com/filecache/instr/q/u/647542_quality_mprovement_reupload.pdf >
Seid, M., Lotstein, D., Valerie L. W., Nelson, C. & Lurie, N. (2006). Quality Improvement: Implications for Public Health Preparedness.
Retrieved from < http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/technical_reports/2006/RAND_TR316.pdf >
William J. R., John W. M., Liza C. C., Leslie M. B., Ronald B. & Abbey, C. (2010). Defining
Quality Improvement in Public Health. Journal of Public Health Management & Practice, Volume 16 (1). 5–7.