"The Population’ s Health and Related Issues" is an engrossing example of a paper on the health system. The article under review is one of the best pieces of information for those who are interested in improved public health. The article by Lorian et al. focuses its attention on the improvement of health for the wider population rather than for a limited cultural, ethnic, social or religious group. The article highlights the importance of integrating healthcare and public health systems. It focuses on forming a system that keeps the individual health needs side by side with the wider population’ s health requirements i. e.
public health. The Affordable Care Act provides a number of reforms that are aimed at improving the healthcare services quality for integrated health systems which take individual and communal health issues into consideration before making any decisions regarding their health. The article directs the attention of policymakers towards the need for an integrated healthcare system where public and individual health is given equal importance and weightage. The cost-effectiveness and success of an integrated system are discussed in detail. In addition, the article highlights some of the important points related to the Health in All Policies (HiAp) paradigm.
The main conclusion of the article, hence, is that integration is the best possible option for an effective health care system that supports prevention and health promotion with cost-effectiveness and operational efficiencies. The article under review is a good source of information in the healthcare field. It highlights the contributions or potential consequences of an integrated healthcare system. The article is aimed at informing the relevant authorities, interested stakeholders and policymakers towards the viability of the integrated system and its advantages in terms of improved healthcare opportunities. The article focuses on the implications and importance of the integrated healthcare system but somehow fails to draw a broader picture that incorporates the failures or pitfalls of ACA.
The lack of trained staff, planning professionals and tight budgeting requirements are some of the important factors which should have been discussed. An integrated system calls for good leadership at the top of every healthcare reform or healthcare provider. The budgets prepared to need to be specifically associated and linked to the various expenses related to health promotion and awareness.
In addition, although the article is a good attempt towards grabbing the attention of the policymakers, it fails to realize the real or practical implications of the ACA reforms. It shows the brighter side of the ACA policies but neglects to discuss the disadvantages which are required to be discussed in order to make an informed and rational decision regarding the issues involved. The article provides real insight into the healthcare improvement area. The article is practically applicable to the current health care system and calls for a change in the approach of the healthcare provider.
The integration is not impractical, however, it requires more than just discussion from the policymakers. Once adopted, as discussed in the article, the integrated healthcare system brings many benefits to society. The cost-effectiveness is one of the greatest advantages that ACA may bring. The improvement in healthcare provisions and availability of healthcare in rural as well as urban areas is another major focus. The article, undoubtedly, is of great importance for the relevant authorities if taken seriously and provides a good start to the debate of the relevance, importance and critical discussion over the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
ReferencesHardcastle, Lorian E. ; Record, Katherine L. ; Jacobson, Peter D. & Gostin, Lawrence O. (2011). Improving the Population's Health: The Affordable Care Act and the Importance of Integration. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):317-327.