"The Right to Health Care" is an engrossing example of a paper on the health system. NESRI or the national economic and social rights initiatives prides itself on the numerous impact, it has generated since the year 2004. Its policies have ensured that the right to health care with regards to the bill of rights is properly followed. Its fast growth has been attributed to a variety of factors such as partnerships, connections, and long term relationships. This has helped it achieve greater results and also cover larger territories within less time. Any organization will always have a source of strength, for Nesri, social approaches have taken the larger percentage.
When it desires to push an agenda, the social path has always helped them came out victorious. Social approaches have been divided into a variety of strategies, where each one is used with regards to the desired results relevant to the core mission. Operations are effectively carried out using individuals that are directly affected by the matter at hand. This strategy is executed with well-trained personnel who would often stress on teamwork as the very determinant of the desired results. NESRI’ S approach to the right to health care has criticized by a variety of groups.
Their main reference has been drawn from cost while advocates to this right, argue that this practice would result in economic productivity. Critics have argued that covering health care to all Americans, would eventually lead to an economic collapse and a rather messy situation (Chapman, 1994). According to them, this move would lead to poor health services, because of the resultant workforce stretch, where the government would be needed to employ an additional workforce.
The workforce would cover up for the created gap among other resultant factors would lead to an economic collapse. There would be many advantages that would be drawn from adopting the right to health care as good as opposed to a commodity (Daniels, 1979). With the alarming rates of bankruptcy and the generally rising rate of poor citizens, covering all Americans would lead to a healthy nation and a more productive society. Covering the masses would transfer the burden of hefty health care charges, where the same cost would be applied to other worrying sectors such as education and entrepreneurship.
This would eventually lead to an equal kind of society, where the richer would be drawn closer to the disadvantaged that are as a result of the health care burden. The national economic and social rights initiatives still prove to be in existence and also fight for what it pushes in the coming years. Its mission is made clear; every citizen must access equitable health and live a longer life. Even with the advantages registered, a relatively large number continues to hinder this process.
As health is considered to be a vital aspect of everyone’ s life, there would be no question as to whether prioritizing the same is necessary or not (Daniels, 1985). NESRI strives to ensure that everyone’ s health is made paramount over the other factors. With a careful approach towards this matter, notable achievements are being witnessed all over the nation. What the bill of rights could not achieve has been made a reality with the ever-growing strategic interventions. Addressing this matter with regards to NESRI and the overall masses must be done on a factual basis.
This entails careful analyzing and using reliable statistical data. My approach to this scenario then lies under solid data and evidence that there is a need for the masses to have access to health care. A government system that cares for its people would result in an overall increase in productivity and a gradual increase in the economy (Beauchamp & Faden, 1979). There should be proper planning, when executing the relevant systems needed to, effectively run all-inclusive health care systems.
NESRI develops mechanisms that are dependent on the masses for execution, should this be applied. There would be a stable system that would sustain what many would refer to as, a free health care system.
Beauchamp, T. L., & Faden, R. R. (1979). The right to health and the right to health care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 4(2), 118-131.
Daniels, N. (1979). Rights to health care and distributive justice: programmatic worries. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 4(2), 174-191.
Daniels, N. (1985). Just health care. Cambridge University Press
Chapman, A. R. (1994). Health care reform: A human rights approach. Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press.
Runciman, B., Merry, A., (2007). Safety and ethics in healthcare: A guide to getting it right. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.