"Subsequent Childbirth after a Previous Traumatic Birth" is a delightful example of a paper on pregnancy. Is the research question congruent with a qualitative approach and with the specific research tradition? Are the data sources, research methods, and analytic approach congruent with the research tradition? The research question in the study was to describe the meaning of women’ s experiences during subsequent births when they had experienced a traumatic birth process in the past. The research question conforms to the qualitative approach used. Notably, the qualitative approach and seeks to analyze the perception of the participants.
In this case, the qualitative approach is effective for determining how women perceive subsequent paths and the entire experience after they have had a traumatic birth in the past. The qualitative approach makes use of tools that could help the participants describe their experience fully. Therefore, the research question exhibits congruence with the qualitative approach. The researchers relied on an internet study, which required participants to describe their experience during a subsequent birth after a traumatic birth in the past. A phenomenological approach was used as the most effective data collection technique because it allowed the participants to describe the meaning in the experiences (Polit & Beck, 2014). Worth noting is the fact that the researchers requested all the participants to give as much detail as possible.
The data collection technique, which served as the most effective data source for the study exhibits relevant congruence with the qualitative approach. The fact that it gives the participants an opportunity to relate their experiences is relevant to the qualitative approach. A close analysis of the analytical approaches in the study also exhibits congruence with the qualitative approach and research tradition (Polit & Beck, 2014).
The researcher relied on an effective analytic approach, which involved identifying and extracting significant statements, formulating meanings, arranging data into clusters of themes, exhaustive description, and finally the establishment of a fundamental structure. Evidently, this approach helped the researchers to understand the meaning expressed by the participants in their description of the birth experience (Beck & Watson, 2010). Were self-report data gathered in a manner that promoted high-quality responses? Who collected the data, and were they adequately prepared for the task? In this study, participants presented self-report data.
The study utilized an internet approach, which allowed participants to email their answers to the questions available on a specified website. Self-report data may present certain flaws because it is impossible to exert control on the manner in which participants present the data. In this case, Participants received information sheets that gave them highlights of the study requirements and objectives (Beck & Watson, 2010). It was one of the measures used to ensure that the participants presented high-quality responses.
However, one cannot say that all the responses given were of high quality. In the internet study, participants needed to describe their birth process in a subsequent birth after experiencing a traumatic one in the past. The only preparation for the task was through the provision of information sheets before the willing mothers could answer the question (Merriam & Merriam, 2009). Comment on the characteristics of the participants, given the purpose of the study The study comprised of 23 participants, a number that was remarkable for a qualitative study. All the women identified in the study were Caucasian.
All the women had experienced a traumatic birth as well as a subsequent one, which they needed to describe. 25 of the participants had had a vaginal birth while the remaining ten had received a cesarean section. Many of the women who participated in the study ranged between 27 and 51 years, which is realistic for the productive period of women. In my view, the characteristics of the participants conformed to the approach adopted in the study (Polit & Beck, 2014).
Beck, C., & Watson, S. (2010). Subsequent Childbirth After a Previous Traumatic Birth. Nursing Research, 59(4), 241-249.
Merriam, S. B., & Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, c2009.
Polit, F. D., & Beck, T. C. (2014). Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice (8th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.