Portfolio for Continuous Professional Development for Third Year Diagnostic Radiography and Imaging – Radiology Example

Download free paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

"Portfolio for Continuous Professional Development for Third Year Diagnostic Radiography and Imaging"  is an outstanding example of a paper on radiology. There are quite a lot of similarities and a few differences between the SOR’ s code of professional conduct and HCPC standards of proficiency. For example, considering the scope of practice, radiographers under the SOR’ s SOR’ s code of professional conduct are expected to safely practice their profession competently within their individual scope of practice (Society of Radiographers, 2014). This can be done by complying with the educational requirements and registration.

Under the HCPC standards of proficiency, it was noted that registered radiographers are expected to carry out their profession safely and effectively within their scope of practice (HCPC, 2013). It means that radiologists at all times should stick with the scope of their practice.                       SOR’ s code of professional conduct gave emphasis on the need to comply with the current legislation and healthcare policy (Society of Radiographers, 2014). This is equivalent to HCPC standards of proficiency which requires the registered radiologists to stay within the ethical and legal boundaries of their chosen profession and comply with HCPC standards and policy (HCPC, 2013).

Both SOR’ s code of professional conduct and HCPC standards of proficiency also encourages each radiologist to pursue specialization by engaging themselves in educational planning, continuous professional development (CPD) and working with other people as they pursue further development in their profession through specialization (Society of Radiographers, 2014; HCPC, 2013). The only difference between the two is that the SOR’ s code of professional conduct requires each radiologist to get professional liability insurance and wear appropriate uniform at work which is not required under the HCPC standards of proficiency (Society of Radiographers, 2014; HCPC, 2013). SOR’ s code of professional conduct and HCPC standards of proficiency are almost similar with one another except for the fact that SOR requires radiographers to get themselves professional liability insurance as part of their professional protection and wear an appropriate uniform to protect themselves from cross-infection and at the same time win the patients’ trust and confidence in their profession (Society of Radiographers, 2014).

As a practitioner, the guidelines stated in the SOR’ s code of professional conduct and HCPC standards of proficiency are both useful in terms of guiding me on how to observe ethical and legal considerations.

As a result, better quality service can be given to each service user. Medico-Legal Aspects Description                       A minimally displaced oblique fracture on the left distal fibula was seen on the image of an appendicular skeleton on the PACS system. Likewise, a widening of the tibia joint on AP was observed from the image. Except for the failure to point out that there was an irregular radiolucent line or possible subtle fracture seen through the AP view aspects of the distal talus, the minimally displaced oblique fracture seen through the left distal fibula and the widening of the tibia talar joint on AP view were very much in accordance with the actual report. Feelings                       I strongly feel that failure to point out irregular radiolucent line at the AP view aspects of the distal talus is a clear sign of professional negligence.

Often times, the analysis coming from clinical imaging tests are required for medico-legal purposes. Therefore, by missing out such important details, radiologists may not have fully submitted complete medical information which is intended to be used for legal proceedings. Evaluation                       Spending hours sitting in the dark trying to compare the image and the actual report was a really good experience.

Doing this exercise made me realize how important it is to accurately compare and contrast the image with the actual report. Since the image will be used for medico-legal purposes, accurately detecting signs of non-accidental injuries is very important. This further explains why radiologists should be able to generate good quality images at all times.                       It was a bad experience knowing that I was not able to point out irregular radiolucent line at the AP view aspects of the distal talus.

Such experience made me realize that I still have a lot of things to learn when it comes to being competitive in my chosen profession. Analysis                       Considering the situation, I intend to continuously improve my ability to read images. Perhaps it is best for me to undergo more training and real-life exposure reading more images.   Conclusion                       Aside from undergoing further training programs, asking a second opinion from my colleagues could also help avoid missing out on some important details from the image. Action Plan                       If I get a chance to compare and contrast an image from the actual report again, I will make it a habit to seek the second opinion from my co-workers.

Perhaps some details that are clear to them may not be so clear in my vision. Clinical Governance Description                       Based on the article entitled “ Are we requesting knee X-rays appropriately? ” ; 2/3 of X-rays performed on acute knee injuries were unnecessary (Mangat et al. , 2013). Feelings                       Aside from gaining more income, I strongly feel that one of the possible reasons why patients with acute knee injuries are being required to undergo unnecessary X-ray procedure is because of insufficient knowledge as to who should or should not be required to have an X-ray. Evaluation                       Reading this article has been a very good experience for me.

First of all, reading the article increased my knowledge with regard to the Ottawa Knee Rules (OKR). Using the OKR guidelines, radiologists can have a better idea of who should have an X-ray procedure when having acute knee injury (i. e.

people more than 55 years old, inability to flex the knee to 90O, etc. )   (Mangat et al. , 2013). Analysis                       To avoid unnecessary X-ray exposure, it is best on the part of radiologists to know by heart the OKR standard criteria. Doing so can help patients from the consequences of long waiting times, unnecessary costs, and exposure to radiation. Likewise, the practice of using the OKR standard criteria can help reduce the unnecessary workload on the part of radiologists.       Conclusion                       X-ray requests are mostly done by doctors, nurse practitioners, triage or consultants.

Therefore, radiologists should discuss with these professionals about the importance of using the OKR standard criteria.

References

HCPC. (2013). Standards of proficiency. Radiographers. [Online] Available at: http://www.hpc-uk.org/assets/documents/10000dbdstandards_of_proficiency_radiographers.pdf [Accessed 28 December 2014].

Mangat, M., Lim, G., Lim, J., Lim, J. and Littlewood, N. (2013). Are We Requesting Knee X-rays Appropriately? An Audit of Compliance with Ottawa Knee Rules. Journal ofv Clinical Audits, 5(1).

Society of Radiographers. (2014). 1. Scope of Professional Practice. [Online] Available at: http://www.sor.org/learning/document-library/code-conduct-and-ethics/1-scope-professional-practice [Accessed 29 December 2014].

Download free paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us